A tale of two traitors|
The formula for the subversion of every country in the world
22nd December 2009
"We need to make the enemy burn and bleed in every way." Winston Churchill in 1941
"People jumped into the canals and waterways and remained swimming or standing up to their necks for hours until the heat died down. Even these suffered burns to the head. The firestorm swept over the water with its showers of sparks so that even thick wooden posts burned down to the level of the water. Children were torn away from their parents hands by the force of the hurricane and whirled into the fire." Written by the police chief of Hamburg, Germany in 1943.
The first thing the Jewish pawn Oliver Cromwell did after capturing command of the newly formed English Republic in 1649 was to give his army, which had finally toppled a succession of befuddled kings, something to do. What Cromwell did then was to go to Ireland and butcher everyone in sight, thus starting a neverending war of Protestants and Catholics, conceived and executed by this maniacal puppet of the Jewish bankers in Holland.
As the Jews had slyly taken over England through bribery, they utterly mutilated Ireland in perpetuity, starting three centuries of the troubles between Protestant and Papist Irish that may well have been the first Jewish false flag terror attack.
Sure, the Irish have a legitimate reason to hate the stupid and cruel British, but it should be known that the Brits like the French, Russians, Germans and Americans who were to follow the same poisoned path centuries later were guided into this murderous colonial stupor by Jewish bankers who twisted the puppet strings of the gullible goyim into perpetual wars for profit.
The history of England sprawls across the landscape of our history like an endless road, from Julius Caesar to Queen Elizabeth, with a hundred kings most of them not very British in between.
One of the best ways to view this stupendous vista of history is in Winston Churchills History of the English Speaking Peoples, with an abridged version at about 500 pages, covering from the Roman occupation to the end of the Victorian Era, or almost 2,000 years.
Even Winston Churchill, who colluded with the Jewish banker power elite on a continuous basis for more than a half century, was appalled and ashamed of what Cromwell, who after engineering the killing of the English king, inflicted such an atrocity on the Irish that it is remembered to this day with a blood-curdling hatred.
In describing Cromwells savage crimes, Churchill writes, Cromwell in Ireland, disposing of overwhelming strength and using it with merciless wickedness, debased the standards of human conduct and sensibly darkened the journey of mankind.
Although the writer didnt mean it that way, this an apt epitaph for what Jewish manipulation of governments from behind the scenes has done to the world.
Churchill as an establishment historian, unfortunately for everyone, was no better than Churchill as a corrupt politician. After reading his mammoth tome, and after persevering through a almost two millennia of constant bloodshed, I came away with the impression that the greatest hero in British history was the invincible Lord Marlborough, a.k.a. John Churchill, who year after year would ride out into Europe, conquer someone after famous battles, and return to England with the bounty, all for the glory of the realm. Ten years in a row he did this in the early 1700s.
England in the early 1700s was a confusing jumble of Protestant religious denominations. All the Protestant denominations today were initially sponsored by Jewish bankers in Holland to undermine the authority of the Church of Rome (something to keep in mind when youre bragging about religious superiority).
The Jews conquered England by means of religion. Circumstances developed that a Catholic king was in line for the throne, so the Protestant Dutchman William of Orange married the daughter of the Duke of York, which eventually led to a new royal family.
Marlborough, Winston says, eventually parted company with the new King William, but here we begin to see the difference between mainstream history and what really happened.
The real historians, Archibald Maule Ramsay and Eustace Mullins, tell a very different story.
In The Nameless War, Ramsay writes:
With James II's (the Duke of Yorks) accession (promotion to king), the crisis could not be long delayed. The most unscrupulous pamphleteering and propaganda was soon in full swing against him, and it is no surprise to find that many of the vilest pamphlets were actually printed in Holland. Britain was now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons (read Jews); and considerable comings and goings took place during these years.
Stories were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law (William of Orange) had joined those who plotted against him; but he utterly refused to credit them, or take any action till news came that the expedition against himself was actually under way.
The chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial juncture was John Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough. It is interesting to read in the Jewish Encyclopedia that this Duke for many years received not less than 6,000 pounds a year from the Dutch Jew Solomon Medina.
The real objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a few years later in 1694, when the Royal consent was given for the setting up of the "Bank of England" and the institution of the National Debt.
This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting money; converted the basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money lenders to secure their loans on the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful undertaking of some ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously obtain.
[Hmm, sounds a lot like whats happening today, doesnt it?]
From that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and drained away the life blood of the land, the real wealth which was the birthright of the British peoples.
Thats the way Capt. Ramsay called it in The Nameless War (p. 11, on my site and on Jackies, Daryls and Anthonys). The legendary historian Eustace Mullins, on pp. 83-84 of The Curse of Canaan, describes it this way.
On Jan. 30, 1657, King Charles was beheaded at Whitehall. Cromwell did not live long enough to enjoy his triumph. He died in 1661, making it possible for King Charles II to regain the throne. Many of Cromwells most dedicated revolutionaries emigrated to the American colonies, where they have exercised a pernicious influence ever since. The Cromwellians were the guiding inspiration of the abolitionist movement which precipitated the Civil War; they have been the behind-the-scene figures in many other disasters in the United States.
Because Charles II was now on the throne of England, the Amsterdam bankers instituted a great financial depression in England in 1674. The unrest caused by this development paved the way for the House of Nassau to seize the throne of England. England made peace with its nemesis, Holland, in 1677. As part of the deal, William of Orange married Mary, daughter of the duke of York, who became King James II when Charles II died in 1685. James now became the only obstacle to Williams taking over the throne of England.
The Amsterdam bankers now launched a frenetic campaign of bribing King James IIs leading aristocratic supporters. The first to succumb was the Duke of Marlborough, John Churchill, ancestor of Winston Churchill. As head of the army, Marlboroughs support was crucial. He accepted bribes of some 350,000 pounds from de Medina and (Moses) Machado. (end citation)
Winston Churchill, the two-time prime minister of England, and esteemed author of this and many other lengthy tomes. History of the England Speaking Peoples indeed. What the folks who control you want you to know would have been a better title.
Capt. Ramsay has quite a bit to say about Winston Churchill, who most people today remember as that fat little man sitting next to Roosevelt and Stalin in that famous photo from Yalta.
As judicial-inc.biz sets the scene . . .
The post World War I 1918 Versailles Treaty decimated Germany causing a depression, enabling Jews to buy up vast amounts of German industry. It left Germans bitter.
International Jewry, represented by 80 percent of those at Versailles, forced Germany to give a portion of their country the Danzig Corridor to Poland.
Hitler was pleading with Poland to give Germany a one mile access to their provence of East Prussia. Both parties were in agreement when in 1939 when Poland suddenly broke off all negotiations.
Roosevelt gave Churchill assurances that the USA would be brought into war against Germany. They secretly made a pact with Poland to come to their defense if Germany attacked.
The 1939 Danzig Massacres: The Polish Jewish Bolsheviks killed 58,000 German nationals in the Danzig corridor In the months leading up to the German invasion. Mass killings of thousands of civilian ethnic Germans (Volksdeutsche) by both civilian and Russian NDVK Jews, who were confident that Poland would quickly defeat Germany. Many apparently expected to take possession of German farms and businesses. An estimated 58,000 German civilians lost their lives in the massacres carried out prior to the 1939 invasion.
Poles had been merrily slaughtering anything or anybody German since at least as early as April 1939, with smaller incidents stretching back to the close of WW I you haven't been told that by the Mass Media, or the fact that these atrocities were one of the main causes for the German invasion of Poland.
Polish Jews were confident they would win against Germany and went on a rampage of ' Blood Lust ' that was unmatched in the small town of Bromberg, which had been given to Poland by the Versailles Treaty. Groups of Bolsheviks attacked from Ponz, Lotz and Warsaw approached the town and started killing the farmers on the outskirts. Children were nailed to barns, women were raped and hacked to death with axes, men were executed where they stood.
On Bromberg Bloody Sunday, thousands of ethnic Germans were slaughtered like pigs in an alley because the majority "poles" (the "slavic", non-Teutonic types, really Turco-Ugaric, Hunnic, Tartar and Mongoloid residue from the old "Dark Age" invasions) knew they could do so with total impunity.
Bloodthirsty Polish Jewish Bolsheviks raped the women, and then killed them. Then they forced the Germans into a church, and burned them alive, 3,500 of them.
Capt. Ramsay, whose short work The Nameless War details the Jewish Revolutions in England, France, Russia and Germany, was a member of the English Parliament and adviser to Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in the late 1930s.
Chamberlain had signed the famous non-aggression treaty with German Field Marshal von Ribbentrop in 1938, and actually thought he had averted war with Germany.
Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organised revolution, but discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact. We need not wonder that the sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded over these men and their leader; nor should we make the mistake of supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter honest men everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for themselves. Nevertheless, if any value liberty, and set out to seek truth and defend it, this duty of personal investigation is one which they cannot shirk. To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentations of a Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer idleness, if for no worse reason. To act on such unverified a basis is to sin against the Light. By September of 1938, Ramsay writes, matters had reached a desperate pass. Mr. Chamberlain himself flew out to Munich and achieved the historic settlement with Hitler. It seemed as though the war mongers had been frustrated, and Europe saved. Rarely had such scenes and evidences of spontaneous delight and thankfulness been evoked as were witnessed throughout Britain and Europe at that triumph.
Those who knew the power of the enemy, however, knew that Mr. Chamberlain's work was certain to be swiftly sabotaged. I remember remarking, on the very evening of his return from Munich, that within a week every newspaper in this country and the war mongers in Parliament, would be attacking Mr. Chamberlain for having secured peace; regardless of the fact that in so doing they were contemptuously flouting the real wishes of the people. This remark was only too true, as events proved.
In a book to justify the indiscriminate use of bombers against the civil population, Mr. J. M. Spaight (a British official) boasts that this form of bombing "saved civilisation": and reveals the startling fact that it was Britain that started this ruthless form of war on the very evening of the day on which Mr. Churchill became Prime Minister, May 11th, 1940.
On page 64 of his book, Mr. Spaight gives a further piece of information, which renders this sudden change of British policy all the more astonishing; for he states that a declaration was made by the British and French Governments on 2nd September, 1939, that "Only strictly military objectives in the narrowest sense of the word would be bombarded."
This declaration, of course, was made in the days of Mr Chamberlain's Premiership; and no single fact perhaps could demarcate and differentiate more clearly the difference in the character and behaviour between Mr. Chamberlain and Mr. Churchill.
Inside the House of Commons, the pro-Jewish war mongers were now becoming more and more intransigent; and more and more set on sabotaging the chances of turning the "phoney war" into a negotiated peace. This in spite of the fact that Britain had nothing to gain by further and total war, and everything to lose.
The Jews, of course, had everything to lose by a peace which left the German goldfree money system and Jew-free Government intact, and nothing to gain. It seemed clearer to me every day that this struggle over the question of civilian bombing was the crux of the whole matter; and that by this method of warfare alone could the Jews and their allies cut the Gordian knot of stalemate leading to peace; and probably later on to a joint attack on Jewish Bolshevism in Russia.
There can be little doubt but that these two downright answers crystallised the resolves of the war mongers to get rid of a Prime Minister whose adherence to an upright and humane policy must inevitably frustrate their plans, seeing that Hitler wished no war with Britain, and would therefore never start civilian bombing himself.
The machinery of intrigue and rebellion against Mr. Chamberlain was set in motion. Ultimately he was saddled with the blame for the Norway blunder; and this pretext was used by the Churchillian-cum-Socialist caucus to secure his downfall.
It should be remembered in this connection that prior to and during the Norway gamble, Mr. Churchill had been invested with full powers and responsibilities for all Naval Military and Air operations; and if anyone therefore deserved to be broken over that second Gallipoli (pursued in defiance of high naval authority warning that, without control of the Cattegat and Skaggerack it could not possibly succeed) it should have been the Minister responsible.
He however was not only unbroken, he was acclaimed Prime Minister. The man who would tear up the British pledge of September 2nd, 1939, and start bombing the civilians of Germany was the man for the war mongers who now ruled the roost.
And so civilian bombing [by England] started on the evening that the architect of the Norwegian fiasco became Prime Minister, viz., May 11th, 1940.
Thats right. On the day Churchill took office, he started bombing civilian targets in Germany. Thats how WW II really started.
Ramsay discovered that James Forrestal (the murdered U.S. Secretary of the Treasury) wrote about a conversation he had while playing golf with former U.S. Ambassador to Britain Joseph P. Kennedy, founder of the so-called Kennedy Dynasty.
Kennedy recounted that British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, before being forced from office, had told him: Neither the French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of war if it had not been for the constant needling from Washington. . . . Chamberlain, he said, stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war."
To repeat: The United States, controlled by World Jewry, started World War II. In four years, 60 million people died.
And there you have it. A tale of two traitors both named Churchill, one who killed the rightful British king and then slaughtered half of Ireland; and his descendant Winston, who started bombing Germany the very day he took office. And both of them working for the Jews.
Now do you know whats happening?
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida and apparently one of the very few who can actually see what is happening to the world. www.johnkaminski.info